Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. This was a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. This was a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The motion was also entitled in the following cases: Atlantic & Pacific Railroad Company; Burlington & Missouri River Railroad Company; California, Central Railway Company ; California Southern Railroad Company; Chicago, Kan. & Nebraska Railway '• Company;' Missouri Pacific Railway Company; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company ; Southern California Railroad Company. Accompanying the motion was the following “ Statement: ” “.May 22, 1889,…
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice:
The motion to dismiss is granted. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47; Hubbard v. Soby, 146 U. S. 56; Railway Company v. Osborne, 146 U. S. 354.
Appeal dismissed.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hubbard v. SobySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BehlmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Little Rock & Memphis Railroad v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Int. St. Com. Comm'n v. Atchison &C. RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893