Legal Opinion

Anderson v. California Department of Correction

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 28, 2020No. 4:20-cv-04368Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBERT D. ANDERSON, Case No. 20-cv-04368-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE; DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND 9 v. DEFENDANTS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; DISMISSING CERTAIN 10 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS WITH CORRECTION, et al., PREJUDICE; DENYING REQUEST 11 FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Defendants. 12 Re: Dkt. No. 7 13 14 Plaintiff, an inmate at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), has filed a pro se action 15 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API