Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Long

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

■Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge) presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

John Conway was in possession of lots 161 and 162, in block 10, of that portion of the present city of East St. Louis which was laid out and formerly known as the town of St. Clair. At his request, John B. Bowman purchased an outstanding title, which was supposed to be paramount, to lot 162, and took the title in his own name, agreeing to convey to Conway upon being repaid the money he advanced in purchasing that title. Bowman was empowered by Conway, as his attorney in fact, to make sale of the lots.

Accordingly, on the 13th of May, 1865, Bowman made a contract with Bartholomew Long for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Phelps v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. . QuinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Gruenewald v. NeuIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Johnson v. Van EppsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
  4. Kew v. TrainorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  5. Le Marchal v. TegardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API