Legal Opinion

Duddy v. Mankewich

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 19, 2006No. 05-P-1011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether a plan submitted by the defendant James J. Mankewich to the planning board of Scituate (board), seeking endorsement under G. L. c. 41, § 8 IP, that approval of the plan was not required under the subdivision control law, requires an affirmative vote by a majority of the members of the board or whether a majority of a quorum of the board will suffice. We conclude that the former is required; therefore, in the absence of the requisite vote, Mankewich’s plan was disapproved.

1. Background. Mankewich and the plaintiffs, John R. and Kathleen A. Duddy and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Acting Superintendent of Bournewood Hospital v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Telesetsky v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Merrill v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Clark v. City Council of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. McElderry v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cottone v. Cedar Lake, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API