Duddy v. Mankewich
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether a plan submitted by the defendant James J. Mankewich to the planning board of Scituate (board), seeking endorsement under G. L. c. 41, § 8 IP, that approval of the plan was not required under the subdivision control law, requires an affirmative vote by a majority of the members of the board or whether a majority of a quorum of the board will suffice. We conclude that the former is required; therefore, in the absence of the requisite vote, Mankewich’s plan was disapproved.
1. Background. Mankewich and the plaintiffs, John R. and Kathleen A. Duddy and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Acting Superintendent of Bournewood Hospital v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Telesetsky v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Merrill v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Clark v. City Council of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- McElderry v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cottone v. Cedar Lake, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006