Legal Opinion
Soskel v. Handler
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas P. Phelan, J.
This is an action to recover damages for alleged violations of sections 349 and 350 of the General Business Law (first cause of action) and for breach of contract (second cause of action) arising out of three surgical hair transplant procedures. Plaintiff’s complaint further alleges, upon information and belief, that “said surgical procedures were performed on or about, July 1991, February 1992 and September 1992, and were in addition to and do not include consultations, and follow up visits for further treatment and care.”
Defendants seek dismissal of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of MontrealNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Abbondandolo v. HitzigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gristede's Foods, Inc. v. Unkechauge NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re African-American Slave Descendants LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- In Re African-American Slave Descendants LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Shelton v. Elite Model Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005