Legal Opinion

VR Optics LLC v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 2019No. 1:16-cv-06392Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VR OPTICS, LLC, Plaintiff, 16-CV-6392 (JPO) -v- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC., Defendant. PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, -v- VILLENCY DESIGN GROUP, LLC, ERIC VILLENCY, and JOSEPH COFFEY, Third-Party Defendants. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This is a patent infringement case involving interactive exercise equipment. Plaintiff VR Optics, LLC (“VR Optics”) brings claims of patent infringement against Defendant Peloton Interactive, Inc. (“Peloton”), and Peloton asserts counterclaims of patent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API