Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Robb
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1965No. 8255PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Judge.
The defendant has appealed from an order granting a new trial. We reverse.
This is a tort action arising out of a two-car intersectional accident in which the injured guest of one car elected to sue the driver of the other vehicle and his employer. She did not sue her host. The case has been tried to two juries and each jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants for a dismissal of the plaintiff’s cause of action. After the first trial, the trial court granted a new trial which we affirmed. See Meyer v. Robb, N.D., 125 N.W.2d 145.
Judgment of dismissal was entered March 25,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc. v. CashmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Kohlman v. HylandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Lindenberg v. FolsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Landscape Development Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Landscape Development Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966