Legal Opinion

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1930No. 2432PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This is a personal injury case which was submitted to the jury upon the general issue, resulting in verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $25,000 damages, from which the defendant appeals.

The switching movement in which the plaintiff was engaged at the time of his injury was a matter of interstate commerce.

The appellee’s theory of the case, as stated in his brief, is 'substantially correct. . With some slight changes it is adopted.

On the night of December 6, 1928, plaintiff was working in the railroad yards in El Paso as a member of appellant’s switching crew of which E. W. Mack was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. HynsonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. PopeTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grocers Supply Co. v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. RittimannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API