State ex rel. Austrian, Wise & Co. v. Duncan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine C.
This is an original application for mandamus to require-the respondent, county judge of Madison county, to pay to the relators the amount of a judgment recovered by relators out of certain moneys paid into court in pursuance of garnishment proceedings and alleged to be properly applicable to the satisfaction of relators’ judgment. There was an order of reference and a report made by the referee in favor of the relators, and the case now comes up upon the relators’ motion for judgment upon the report and the-respondent’s exceptions to the report.
Upon December 1, 1888, suits were begun…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steen v. NortonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Wells v. American Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Cox v. TylerNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Noakes v. SwitzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cizek v. CizekNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Merrill v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial District State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
- Gilbert v. MarrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- First State Bank of New York Mills v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Stone v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.