Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Austrian, Wise & Co. v. Duncan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1893No. 3830PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine C.

This is an original application for mandamus to require-the respondent, county judge of Madison county, to pay to the relators the amount of a judgment recovered by relators out of certain moneys paid into court in pursuance of garnishment proceedings and alleged to be properly applicable to the satisfaction of relators’ judgment. There was an order of reference and a report made by the referee in favor of the relators, and the case now comes up upon the relators’ motion for judgment upon the report and the-respondent’s exceptions to the report.

Upon December 1, 1888, suits were begun…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steen v. NortonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Wells v. American Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cox v. TylerNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Noakes v. SwitzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cizek v. CizekNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Merrill v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial District State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Gilbert v. MarrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. First State Bank of New York Mills v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Stone v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API