Legal Opinion
Clatterbuck v. City of Charlottesville
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 19, 2015No. Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00043PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, individuals described in their complaint as “impecunious and reliant to a certain extent on begging” for sustenance, challenge the constitutionality of a subsection of the City Code of Charlottesville, Virginia that prohibits individuals from soliciting immediate donations near two streets running through the Downtown Mall. The matter is now before me upon consideration of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, which have been fully briefed and heard and supplemented. For the reasons stated herein, I find that the City of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saltz v. City of Frederick, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Saltz v. City of Frederick, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021