Legal Opinion

Krusemark v. Hansen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1980No. 14761PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

Plaintiff appeals from a Park County District Court judgment granting summary judgment to the defendant. Summary judgment was granted because the plaintiff failed to file an opposition brief within the time limits provided by the local court rules of Park County District Court. The primary issue in this appeal is whether a trial court can take such action in light of the specific provisions set forth in the rule governing summary judgment in this state, Rule 56, M.R.Civ.P.

Plaintiff commenced this action on February 18, 1977 by filing a complaint in which he alleged that the defendant had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harland v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bahm v. DormanenMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cheyenne Western Bank v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roy v. NeibauerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Cole v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Knight & Co. v. Fort Belknap Indian AgencyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Krusemark v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API