Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Anderson

(After stating the facts as above.) It will serve no useful purpose to discuss the sufficiency of the evidence. We have examined the evidence carefully, and are satisfied that under it the jury were authorized to find the defendant liable.

The defendant complains in the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial that the court erred in allowing the plaintiff to testify that he had no education or profession. The evidence was objected to as being irrelevant and immaterial to any issue in the case, and prejudicial. We do not think there was any error in the court’s ruling. It…