Legal Opinion · Dissent

Varriale v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 11, 2015No. 85/14Published

1Dissent

HARRELL, J.,

which ADKINS, J., joins.

This case illustrates a corollary of the aphorism that “no good deed goes unpunished,” “be not so quick to volunteer.” After the report of an alleged rape, George Varriale (at worst, a person of interest at the time) consented to a police request that he supply biological samples from his person in order for police to determine whether he could be inculpated or exculpated as a suspect in the rape through comparison of his DNA profile with that of DNA left behind under the fingernails of the alleged victim apparently by the alleged unknown rapist.1 *426Based on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API