Varriale v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
HARRELL, J.,
which ADKINS, J., joins.
This case illustrates a corollary of the aphorism that “no good deed goes unpunished,” “be not so quick to volunteer.” After the report of an alleged rape, George Varriale (at worst, a person of interest at the time) consented to a police request that he supply biological samples from his person in order for police to determine whether he could be inculpated or exculpated as a suspect in the rape through comparison of his DNA profile with that of DNA left behind under the fingernails of the alleged victim apparently by the alleged unknown rapist.1 *426Based on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.