Legal Opinion

Life Industries Corp. v. Star Brite Distributing, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 22, 1993No. CV 91-1659PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

WEXLER, District Judge.

On July 28, 1993, this Court issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in which it found that Star Brite Distributing, Inc.’s (“Star Brite’s” or “Defendant’s”) polysulfide caulking product, Boat Caulk, intentionally infringed upon the trade dress of Life Industries Corporation’s (“Life’s” or “Plaintiffs”) polysulfide caulking product, Boatlife Life Calk in violation of the Federal Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq., commonly known as the Lanham Act.1 Although Plaintiff failed to prove actual damages, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia JayceesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Beech-Nut Packing Co. v. P. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Huber Baking Company v. Stroehmann Brothers Company and Quality Bakers of America Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Scott Paper Co. v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Life Industries Corporation v. Star Brite Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Gidatex, S.R.L. v. Campaniello Imports, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Glendora v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API