Legal Opinion

Richardson v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0508PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

In this case, plaintiffs allege that defendant L’Oréal USA, Inc., falsely and deceptively labeled several products as available exclusively in salons. The parties have moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement and preliminary certification of the settlement class. After careful consideration of , the supporting memorandum and the accompanying exhibits, the Court will grant the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement and preliminary certification of' the settlement class.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs filed this action on April 15,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Radosti v. ENVISION EMI, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Trombley v. National City BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ross v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Prince v. Aramark CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Allen v. Similasan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
  4. Abraha v. Colonial Parking, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Lusk v. Five Guys Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API