Schnupp v. Blair Pharmacy, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES ex rel. TIMOTHY SCHNUPP, Relator, v. Civil No. ELH-17-2335 BLAIR PHARMACY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this qui tam action, Timothy Schnupp, the Relator, sued his former employer, Blair Pharmacy, Inc. (“BPI,” “Blair Pharmacy,” or “Pharmacy”), and its principal, Matthew Blair (“Mr. Blair”) (collectively, “Blair”), pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA”),
31 U.S.C. §§ 3728
et seq. See ECF 1 (“Complaint”). The FCA “imposes civil liability for presenting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.