United States v. Reed
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Appellant Cameron K. Reed’s (“Reed”) appeal of the Magistrate Judge’s denial of his Motion to Dismiss Counts Five and Six of the Amended Complaint. Specifically, Reed challenges the Magistrate Judge’s conclu-’ sion that the Assimilative Crimes Act (“ACA”), which incorporates state criminal law when a crime occurs on federal land, assimilates two provisions of Nevada state law, which criminalize driving with certain levels of marijuana or marijuana metabolite in the blood.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts are not in dispute for purposes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Williams v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. RochaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Vincent Earl WaitesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Robert K. Souza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cameron Reed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013