Legal Opinion
Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 29, 1956No. 15370_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITTAKER, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission, after hearings, found that petitioner, which manufactures and sells automobile repair or replacement parts in interstate commerce, has granted to its customers, at the end of each annual period, a retroactive volume rebate consisting of a flat, graded, percentage of the aggregate dollar volume of their respective purchases in the preceding year, and that this practice has discriminated in price between different purchasers of like grades and qualities of its products, and that the effect “may be to substantially lessen, injure, destroy or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Atlas Building Products Co. v. Diamond Block & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- The Morning Pioneer, Inc. v. The Bismarck Tribune Company, a Corporation, and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Checker Motors Corporation v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.