Perches v. Elcom, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
The following background is derived from the undisputed facts as found in the parties’ motions in support of and in opposition to summary judgment in the present employment discrimination action.
Defendant Elcom, Inc. manufactures automotive components and wire harnesses for vehicles. Def.’s Proposed Undisputed Facts ¶ 1 (“Def.’s Facts”). Plaintiff Rose Perches, an African-American, first worked…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evans v. Texas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
- Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
- Smith v. PotterDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009
- BAUTISTA v. SWBC PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYER SERVICES I, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024
- IQBAL v. University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.