Legal Opinion

Amo v. Pincince

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 21, 2000No. SC 16264Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this mechanic’s lien foreclosure action, we granted the petition of the plaintiff, Charles Amo, for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s granting of the motion of the defendants, Robert J. Pincince and Joan C. Pincince,1 to open the judgment of strict foreclosure.2 Amo v. Pincince, 55 Conn. App. 767, 740 *863A.2d 895 (1999). After reviewing the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Amo v. PincinceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Amo v. PincinceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API