Legal Opinion

Amo v. Pincince

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 2, 2000No. SC 16264PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 767 (AC 19304), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the plaintiffs claim based on an inadequate record, where the plaintiff appealed the issue of the trial court’s jurisdiction to open a foreclosure judgment after title to the property had passed from the defendants, and the record included the judgment of foreclosure, the passing of the law days, the vesting of title in another party, the motion to open judgment being filed after title…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amo v. PincinceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amo v. PincinceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API