Legal Opinion

Sterricker v. Dickinson

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This waa a suit in equity, commenced before the code. Deferred by stipulation, dated November 30,1848, to Thomas B. Mitchell, Esq. to take the testimony and state the account between the parties under the pleadings, and report to the court. The referee reported that there was due the plaintiff $200, and that the plaintiff was entitled to one-fifth of a certain farm, which the referee valued at $6325. At the special term in Otsego, in July, 1850,

1Opinion of the CourtMonson, J.

Mary Sutphen derived title to the property in question from her husband, Matthew L. Sutphen, by his will, dated the 28th of January, 1827. On the 26th of April, 1830, she executed her last will and testament, which contained the following clauses: “ I give and devise unto my brother Martin *517Dickinson, all the right, title and interest which I now have under and by virtue of the last will and testament of Matthew L. Sutphen, my late husband, deceased, or otherwise, of in and to that certain farm or lot of land situate, lying and being in the town of Cherry Valley, aforesaid, and in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irving v. De KayNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Sweet v. JacocksNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  3. Jenkins v. Van SchaackNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. In re DekayNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  5. Bellinger v. ShaperNew York Court of Chancery · 1845

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BeckmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. Kelley v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API