Legal Opinion
Richard H. v. Clay County, Minn.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 2, 1986No. Civ. 4-86-20PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richard H. brought this action against Clay County, Minnesota, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendant violated his rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution by subjecting him to a strip search. He seeks injunctive relief, damages, attorney’s fees, and costs. Jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. The matter is now before the court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
The issue here is whether plaintiff’s cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations. Under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Steven Ray Wycoff v. James Menke, Official of the Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Occhino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cabrales v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Kessel v. SchaffDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1987
- Rhodes v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987