Legal Opinion
Kessel v. Schaff
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided August 12, 1987No. Civ. No. A1-86-077PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONMY, Chief Judge.
Joseph Kessel brings this action against Defendants, Matt Schaff and the City of Belfield, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his rights secured under the fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendments. Defendants have moved this court for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P. Summary judgment is appropriate only where there are no genuine issues of material fact and it appears that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Williams v. City of St. Louis, 783 F.2d 114, 115 (8th Cir.1986).
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Robinson v. NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hunter v. Sioux City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018