Legal Opinion

Templeton v. Interstate Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 8, 1948No. 38070PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

The plaintiff, Boyd Templeton, alleging that the Dixie Auto Lee Stores, Inc., and the Interstate Electric Company entered into a scheme or collusion with M. M. and Marshall Hearne for the purpose of inducing the latter two to breach their contract with him for the purchase of his business (including his stock and fixtures) then being operated in Jonesboro, Louisiana, under the trade name of Templeton Dixie Auto Lee Store, in order that the companies might sell the Hearnes new stock and fixtures, seeks to recover damages against the four in solido in the sum of $2,571.85.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cust v. Item Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. SpurneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Moss v. GuariscoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. D'Antoni v. D'AntoniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Lucky v. FricksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Dion v. KnapLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API