Legal Opinion

Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1969No. 4275PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

L. T. Marshall was accidentally injured and, in this workman’s compensation case, he sought and obtained judgment, based on the jury’s findings, that his injury caused total permanent incapacity. The insurance company has appealed.

Appellant’s points are, in substance, that the court erred in holding: (1) that Dr. O’Loughlin was not required to state his medical findings and conclusions to the jury, because such testimony was privileged by virtue of Federal Statute, 42 U. S.C.A., Section 1306; (2) that the doctor’s testimony was privileged, because he was not an employee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Hubbard v. Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1959
  4. In re Contempt Proceedings Against MengelDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
  2. Avila v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Tootle v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Avila v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API