Legal Opinion
United States v. William F. Shriver
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 29, 1988No. 87-2279PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
William F. Shriver was convicted on three counts of knowingly making false statements to influence a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (1982). 1 Shriver appeals his conviction on three grounds: (1) the district court erred in admitting the impermissibly prejudicial testimony of a businessman, William Wooten, whose company had prior business dealings with Shriver; (2) there was insufficient evidence to convict Shriver on counts II and III; and (3) the judge erroneously instructed the jury that Shriver’s statements to the bank were material. We affirm…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Beard v. Whitley County REMCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Alan ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Brody v. GuercioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Larry Liefer, George Sharos, and Charles PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Washington v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Nicolas GomezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Karl C. SchaveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.