Legal Opinion
Matter of Welfare of LZ
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 11, 1986No. C7-85-1375, C7-85-1665 and C9-85-1666PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellants C.R.P., age 12, and his sister S.L.P., age 10, were cited for habitual truancy. Following a hearing, the trial judge found the citation proven. The judge placed appellants under probationary supervision and ordered them to attend all classes during the next school year. The trial court also ordered psychological evaluations of all family members and a chemical dependency assessment for the minors’ parents.
Appellant L.Z. was cited with one count of habitual truancy under Minn.Stat. § 120.10 (1984). A referee originally heard L.Z.’s case and found the citation…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- State v. BrechonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Welfare of L.Z.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986