Mayes v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Enoch Eaw, judge pro hac vice. Cobb superior court. March term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
This was a suit by McCormick Harvesting Machine Company against M. A. Mayes, upon a written contract entered into by him for the purchase of a machine for harvesting grain. The portion of the contract necessary to a clear understanding of the issues involved is in the following language: " This machine is warranted to be well made, of good material, and durable with proper care. If upon one day’s trial the machine should not work well, the purchaser shall give immediate notice to said McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, or their agent, and allow time to send a person to put it in order. If…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Brooks Bros. Lumber Co. v. Case Threshing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- General Motors Corp. v. Halco Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Walker & Rogers v. Malsby Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Baer Grocer Co. v. Barber Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.