Legal Opinion

Brown v. Latham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. December 20, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

1. Where there is no assignment of error upon a charge of the court save that the court erred in so charging, and the charge states a proposition of law which is in the abstract correct, this court will not consider whether the charge is applicable or appropriate in the case. Central Railway Co. v. Bond, 111 Ga. 14 (8); Wight v. Schmidt, 111 Ga. 858.

2. If there was any error in the failure of the court to charge upon a certain issue in the case, the error was cured by the plaintiff's writing off, in accordance with the order of the court, as much of the verdict as could possibly have resulted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wight & Weslosky v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stansell v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Demmons v. BookerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API