Legal Opinion

Wight & Weslosky v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 7, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Seabrook. Washington superior court. May term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

1. No cause for reversing a judgment denying a new trial is presented by a general assignment of error, that the verdict is contrary to the charge of the court, or to a specified portion thereof (Athens Mfg. Co. v. Rucker, 80 Ga. 291; Roberts v. Keeler, ante, 181); nor by a complaint merely alleging that the court erred in refusing, upon the request of movant, to rule out the testimony of a certain witness which related to a specified subject, such testimony not being otherwise indicated, and the ground upon which it was sought to be excluded not being stated; nor *859by an assignment of error in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Athens Manufacturing Co. v. RuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Ponder v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Hightower v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Thomas v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Atlantic Coast-Line Railroad v. Henderson Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API