Legal Opinion

Redskin Mining Co. v. McNeal MacHinery Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1925No. 14815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.

The parties to this action appear as in the court below. The Redskin Mining Company had purchased certain machinery from the McNeal Machinery Company. There was an unpaid balance on the said machinery, and the McNeal Machinery Company held a chattel mortgage to secure the payment of the same. It is not evident from the pleadings the exact amount of the unpaid balance owing to the defendant by reason of said mortgage indebtedness, but from the record it is shown that a sum ranging from $1,809 to $3,000 remained unpaid. It appears that the plaintiff, desiring to sell the machinery, had a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deming Inv. Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Hawkins v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hausam v. PoehlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Blair v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Inter-State Mortgage Trust Co. v. Duke Poor BuffaloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Orchid Shoppe, Inc. v. Sherwood Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. KenneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API