Legal Opinion

In Re Howarth Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1981No. Docket 53383PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves a contested claim against an estate. Appellee, the mother of the deceased, recovered the $23,940 principal of a promissory note, with $11,318.60 interest. Since the promissory note at issue included a promise to pay "costs of collection if not paid at maturity”, appellee also was allowed to recover $11,806.64 as costs of collection. Appellant appeals by right pursuant to MCL 600.861; MSA 27A.861.

Appellant first argues that the trial court erred by declining to hold that the promissory note had been discharged by an accord and satisfaction during the deceased’s lifetime.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S C Gray, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Klass v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In Re Schafer's BakeriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
  4. Security Trust Co. v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re Granville EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zeeland Farm Services, Inc v. Jbl Enterprises, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Dery v. General Motors Corp. (In Re Fordson Engineering Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. In Re Cole EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Cunninghame v. CunninghameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Village of Hickory Pointe Homeowners Ass'n v. SmykMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API