Legal Opinion

Doster v. Continental Casualty Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 11, 1958No. 6 Div. 270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree overruling demurrers to the amended bill and its several aspects, denying a motion to dissolve an injunction issued in the cause, and denying a motion to discharge the injunction.

Appellee, sometimes hereafter referred to as Continental, filed this bill for exoneration of surety against appellant Dost-er alleging, that Respondent had been awarded a contract by the Board of Education of Birmingham to construct the North Roebuck School; that Complainant became his surety on the performance and payment bonds required by Tit. 50, § 16,. Code 1940;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thomas v. St Paul's M. E. ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Tillis v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Segall v. LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. West v. ChastenSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  5. Hudson Trust Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frontier Insurance v. International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
  2. Hanover Insurance v. Hudak & Dawson ConstructionDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
  3. American Southern Insurance Company v. Peavy Construction Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
  4. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Apex Contracting Services, LLC; Zachary M. Bell; and Kelly L. ShirkDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2026
  5. Western Surety Company v. NilesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API