Doster v. Continental Casualty Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decree overruling demurrers to the amended bill and its several aspects, denying a motion to dissolve an injunction issued in the cause, and denying a motion to discharge the injunction.
Appellee, sometimes hereafter referred to as Continental, filed this bill for exoneration of surety against appellant Dost-er alleging, that Respondent had been awarded a contract by the Board of Education of Birmingham to construct the North Roebuck School; that Complainant became his surety on the performance and payment bonds required by Tit. 50, § 16,. Code 1940;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thomas v. St Paul's M. E. ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Tillis v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Segall v. LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- West v. ChastenSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
- Hudson Trust Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frontier Insurance v. International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
- Hanover Insurance v. Hudak & Dawson ConstructionDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
- American Southern Insurance Company v. Peavy Construction Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
- Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Apex Contracting Services, LLC; Zachary M. Bell; and Kelly L. ShirkDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2026
- Western Surety Company v. NilesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025