Legal Opinion

Wurst v. Pruyn

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1966No. 6719PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILES, Judge.

This action was instituted to recover damages suffered by plaintiffs when their residence fell hato ruin and delapidation allegedly because defendants performed poor workmanship and used defective materials in the construction of it for plaintiffs. Plaintiffs purchased the lot of ground and contracted with defendants for the construction of the residence and acquired title to the lot of ground and the building in a package deal for the price of $16,000. They seek to recover the purchase price of $16,000, for mental anguish, suffering and embarrassment $10,-000, and $480 for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powell v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
  2. Fremont v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  3. Chatelaine v. Globe Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Kuhlman v. TalleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wurst v. PruynSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. Wurst v. PruynSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API