Commonwealth v. Seymour
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The defendant appeals from her conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, claiming that her privilege against self-incrimination and the provision of G. L. c. 90, § 24(1) (e), making evidence of failure to submit to a breathalyzer test inadmissible at trial, were violated when the trial judge permitted the prosecutor to ask her on cross-examination whether she had refused to take a breathalyzer test. This error was compounded, the defendant contends, when the prosecutor, during her closing speech, argued that the defendant’s refusal to submit to a breathalyzer…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MahdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. KoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Commonwealth v. RedmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. IrwinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. BurbineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. QuinnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. CarnellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001