Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Seymour

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 24, 1996No. 94-P-1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The defendant appeals from her conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, claiming that her privilege against self-incrimination and the provision of G. L. c. 90, § 24(1) (e), making evidence of failure to submit to a breathalyzer test inadmissible at trial, were violated when the trial judge permitted the prosecutor to ask her on cross-examination whether she had refused to take a breathalyzer test. This error was compounded, the defendant contends, when the prosecutor, during her closing speech, argued that the defendant’s refusal to submit to a breathalyzer…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MahdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. KoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Commonwealth v. RedmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. IrwinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. BurbineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. QuinnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. CarnellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API