Commonwealth v. Carnell
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtRapoza, J.
A jury convicted the defendant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. On appeal, he argues that the failure to cure testimony incorrectly asserting that he refused to take a blood test following his arrest constituted reversible error. We agree and reverse the conviction.
Facts. The jury could have found the following facts. In the early morning hours of January 31, 1998, the defendant, ac*357companied by two passengers, drove through a flashing red light, nearly striking a cruiser driven by State police Trooper James Hanlon. Hanlon signaled the defendant to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MaltaisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. ZevitasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. RepozaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. SounMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012