Legal Opinion

Burness v. Bruce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1989No. E85-2140; CA A47121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff on his claims for breach of contract, for foreclosure of a security interest and for defendant on his counterclaim. We remand for entry of a judgment not inconsistent with this opinion.

In September, 1980, plaintiff and defendant entered into two contracts. The first was a stock sale agreement in which plaintiff agreed to sell defendant all outstanding common stock in his automobile dealership for $261,635. The second was a noncompetition agreement under which, in exchange for $50,000, plaintiff agreed not to compete with defendant’s new dealership.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Oregon Bank v. Nautilus Crane & Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Alk v. LaniniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Rainbow Construction Co. v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oregon Southwest, LLC v. KvaternikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API