Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Murray
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ottawa. (Padgham, J.) Bill to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a bill filed against the Nunica Creamery Company and the various subscribers to its stock to enforce a mechanic’s lien.
The complainant entered into a contract with,the numerous subscribers in the vicinity of Nunica, by which the Davis & Bankin Building & Manufacturing Company, party of the first part, agreed with the subscribers, parties of the second part, to build a ■ combined butter and cheese factory at'or near Nunica, according to certain defined specifications. The contract contained further provisions as follows:
“ The party of the second part hereby agrees to select and furnish…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. BelfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pittsley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Rumsey v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. CuppWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895