Legal Opinion

Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Murray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa. (Padgham, J.) Bill to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a bill filed against the Nunica Creamery Company and the various subscribers to its stock to enforce a mechanic’s lien.

The complainant entered into a contract with,the numerous subscribers in the vicinity of Nunica, by which the Davis & Bankin Building & Manufacturing Company, party of the first part, agreed with the subscribers, parties of the second part, to build a ■ combined butter and cheese factory at'or near Nunica, according to certain defined specifications. The contract contained further provisions as follows:

“ The party of the second part hereby agrees to select and furnish…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. BelfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pittsley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Rumsey v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. CuppWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API