Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Davis v. Belford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1888PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Moore J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought in the circuit court for the county of Oakland, against the defendants, 42 in number, charging them jointly upon a contract, the essential parts of which are as follows:

“ Contract and Srecieications eor the Chicago Cream“erv Association.
“ Davis & Rankin, Proprietors.
“ Chicago, III., November 20, 1885.

‘‘We, Davis & Rankin, party of the first part, agree with the parties of the second part to erect and put in operation a ■creamery at or near Holly, Oakland county, Michigan, including an ice-house, engine and coal room.

“The building to be 28x50 feet, 12…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frost v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Davis & Rankin v. HendrixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. BoothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Pittsley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Byrne v. WernerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API