Legal Opinion

Stertzbach v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Special Term. We add that petitioner’s notice of claim was served timely because she did not become aggrieved until September 1, 1981, the effective date of her reassignment and the earliest date that her cause of action could have accrued (Education Law § 3813 [1]; see, Matter of Vail v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 115 AD2d 231). Also, petitioner was not required to appeal to the Commissioner of Education (see, Education Law § 310) because "in litigation between private parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mtr. Lezette v. Bd. of Educ., HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Cottrell v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cottrell v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Cottrell v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Vail v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lloyd v. GrellaNew York Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API