Legal Opinion

Small v. Saunders

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The plaintiffs’ claim that the request for instructions was granted by the court’s statement to counsel of a purpose to submit specially to the jury the question of the defendants’ damages under their special plea in case a general verdict for the defendants were returned, and a statement to the jury that after they returned a verdict under the instructions given them, he might “ conclude to submit a special question” to them is not tenable. No ruling was made and the requested instruction was not given. Statement of a purpose to make a ruling in a certain way before the time for it comes is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parkinson v. Nashua & Lowell R. R.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  2. Kuba v. Devonshire MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  3. Woodbury v. WhitingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
  4. Twarog v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerry v. NeugebauerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Hatch v. HillsgroveSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API