Legal Opinion

Twarog v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 1, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

As the plaintiff’s bill of exceptions is understood, he seeks to have the verdict set aside by reason of errors in the court’s instructions and in the admission and exclusion of evidence. None of the evidence has been stated in the bill of exceptions; therefore, if any exceptions were taken to the admission or exclusion of evidence, they are not before us.

An examination of the record discloses that an exception was taken by the plaintiff to an instruction of the court, which related solely to damages. The jury, having found that the defendants were not liable, “had no occasion to consider the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beckley v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  2. Kuba v. Devonshire MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  3. Woodbury v. WhitingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Small v. SaundersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API