Gerli v. Poidebard Silk Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
, On error to the Hudson Circuit. The two writs of error-were heard together.
1Opinion of the Court
*433The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
On March 28th, 1893, C. & E. Gerli, Eratelli & Company, entered into a contract to sell and deliver in New York, to the .Poidebard Silk Manufacturing Company, thirty bales of extra Piva new silk, deliverable, ten bales July 20th to 25th, ten bales August 15th, and ten bales September 1st to 10th, each installment to be paid for sixty days after delivery, at $5.90 per pound. In consequence of the lateness of the new crop it was impossible for the sellers to make delivery of the first ten bales within the time specified, and on July 27th the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Otis v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sullivan v. ViscontiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil & Transport CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Rock Island Sash & Door Works v. Moore, Handley Hdw. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Seerup v. GoraczkowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Empire Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.