United States v. Kendall M. Mayfield
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
Through application of the savings clause, 1 U.S.C. § 109. we affirm the district court’s ruling that rejected the appellant’s challenges to his convictions on statute of limitations and overbreadth grounds.
FACTS
Anchor Savings Bank (Anchor) hired Kendall M- Mayfield, the appellant, in April, 1985, as part of Anchor’s expansion of branch locations in Georgia and Florida. Anchor decided to establish business in the area of consumer lending known as “indirect automobile financing.” Anchor hired Mayfield to establish an indirect automobile lending program at Anchor through…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Del Ray Keith ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Ritter v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- United States v. HodgesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2011
- Mayfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.