Legal Opinion

Kelter Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1956No. Appeal, No. 80PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Wright, J.,

Charles T. Kelter was employed by the Progress Platemaking Company in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as a stereotyper, working on the day shift. Due to insufficient work, men on the day shift were.idle, while men on the night shift, were working overtime. In order to balance the work force, the employer decided to transfer several men .to the night shift.- Kelter was the lást employe on the day 'shift in point of seniority, and was requested to; accept a transfer. lipón his refusal, he was laid off. His application for unemploy: *69ment benefits was disallowed by the Bureau,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelleher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Pusey Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Hoffstot v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Spotts Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Watson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. Dobbs House, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Rosell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. York v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Scheibel Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Gray v. Dobbs House, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API