Kelter Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Wright, J.,
Charles T. Kelter was employed by the Progress Platemaking Company in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as a stereotyper, working on the day shift. Due to insufficient work, men on the day shift were.idle, while men on the night shift, were working overtime. In order to balance the work force, the employer decided to transfer several men .to the night shift.- Kelter was the lást employe on the day 'shift in point of seniority, and was requested to; accept a transfer. lipón his refusal, he was laid off. His application for unemploy: *69ment benefits was disallowed by the Bureau,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelleher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pusey Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hoffstot v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Spotts Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Watson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gray v. Dobbs House, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rosell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- York v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Scheibel Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Gray v. Dobbs House, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976