Legal Opinion

ST., BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of Troutdale

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 1977No. 421424, CA 5819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*95THORNTON, J.

The sole issue presented here is whether defendant city has authority to adopt and enforce within the city a requirement for building construction which is more stringent than that provided in the state building code.

The state, acting through its Department of Commerce, brought suit to enjoin defendants from enforcing a city ordinance specifically requiring "double wall” construction of all buildings within the city. Under the state code "single wall” construction is allowed. After a trial the circuit court held that the challenged ordinance conflicted with the "Structural…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dent v. Oregon CityOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. City of Minnetonka v. Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. City of Beaverton v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. ST., BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API