Legal Opinion

PHS. Van Ommeren Shipping (U.S.A.), Inc. v. International Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 24, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are ship brokers, sue for amounts equal to the commissions which they allege would have been payable upon a contract for affreightment of *201coal, which was executed, and upon ship charters, which were projected. Defendant is not a party to the coal affreightment contract and would not have been a party to the ship charters. Allied Transportation Corporation, hereinafter “Allied”, executed the coal affreightment contract as carrier and would have executed the ship charters as charterer. Liability is sought to be imposed upon defendant based on its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Petterson v. PattbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Auerbach v. Internationale Wolfram Lampen Aktien GesellschaftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
  4. B. W. Lougheed & Co. v. SuzukiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. B.W. Lougheed Co., Ltd. v. SuzukiNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API