Legal Opinion

Rigmaiden v. Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 2006No. 05CA0487PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge GRAHAM.

Defendant, the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (the department), appeals the judgment of the district court reversing the department's final ageney decision determining that plaintiff, Helen Rigmaiden, was no longer eligible to receive benefits under the Home- and Com*500munity-based Services for the Elderly, Blind, and Disabled (HCBS) program. The district court determined that without a written hearing transcript, the department could not reverse the initial decision allowing benefits. We affirm.

I. Medicaid Program

The state administers a Medicaid…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Garvey v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  2. State Board of Medical Examiners v. McCroskeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Matter of Title, Ballot Title for No. 62Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Dove Valley Business Park Associates, Ltd. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. HoffnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colorado Real Estate Commission v. BartlettColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Chostner v. Colorado Water Quality Control CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. American National General Insurance Co. v. RiveraColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. AMERICAN NATIONAL GENERAL IN. CO. v. RiveraColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API