Legal Opinion

James Hindall v. Winterthur International and Travelers Indemnity Co. Of Illinois

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2003No. 01-3414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff James Hindall (“Hindall”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Winterthur International (“Winterthur”) and Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois (“Travelers”) as well as the district court’s denial of his summary judgment motion. Hindall was injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by the negligence of an underinsured driver. At the time of the accident, Hindall was an employee of Philips Display, a subsidiary of Philips Electronics North America, which had contracted for insurance with both Winterthur and Travelers. Hindall…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Glenn W. Phelps, Jr. v. Robert M. Coy, Jr., Christin StutesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. General Electric Company v. G. Siempelkamp Gmbh & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Gyori v. Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  2. Daniels v. VernatterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API